Prejudice: A Worldwide Problem :: essays research papers

impairment A Worldwide Problem     There is a dangerous and often deadly bother in the world today. It reaches beyond political and ghostlike boundaries and spans across all economic and social statuses. It affects the homeless, middleclass, and the richest people in society. The problem is injury.      In the States, when we think of prejudice we often think of it in damage of Black and White. However, prejudice is much more than that. It is a broad experimental condition that can encompass things like racism, sexism, and religious persecution.The Encarta World English vocabulary defines prejudice as "a pre make opinion, usually an unfavorable one, establish on insufficient knowledge, irrational feelings, or inaccurate stereotypes" and "the holding of opinions that are formed beforehand on the basis of insufficient knowledge". When I get a line those definitions, I have to wonder why prejudice still exists today. If it very is based on "insufficient knowledge", then it seems to me that there is no logical reason why prejudice is still so prevalent. end-to-end our entire lives we are exposed to liberates dealing with prejudice. In school we mull over biography, geography, government, and psychology, and at some point in each of those subjects, the consequent of prejudice is more than likely discussed. In the corporate world we attend multitudinous classes and seminars on discrimination, and sensitivity training on issues that could be deemed prejudicial. The issues are easily known and a vast amount of information is available on the subject, so how can "insufficient knowledge" and "preformed opinions" still be a factor? I believe it is because when we discuss prejudice or whatsoever other similar issue, we tend to discuss it at a societal level as opposed to a personal level. We discuss the history of prejudice and talk about things like slavery in America and Hit lers persecution of the Jews, but we never discuss the prejudice that we, as individuals, experience everyday. Certainly, no one would stand up in a classroom, point a finger at a student, and ask accusatively, "What act of prejudice did you apply today?" That would not be "politically correct". How then, can we bugger off this issue down to a personal level?Someone once said to me, that if I didnt like jelly donuts, then I was prejudiced. The issue of whether or not I like jelly donuts is not an issue of prejudice, but rather a personal distaste for jelly donuts, based on the fact that I have tried several contrasting types and determined that I do not like them.