Employment Law- Anne Marie Grozdanich V. Leisure Hills Health Center

Anne Marie Grozdanich vs . blank Hills pertainNameClass , SectionProfessor NameOctober 29 , 2005Anne Marie Grozdanich vs . Leisure Hills CenterHas there been quid professional quo /tangible practice accomplishment worryingNeither term can be applied to this field of study . Quid pro quo , or uncouth consideration , is an exchange of valuables between parties , wherein each company has something to egest and receive . In this bailiwick , the complainant Anne , was not presented with an run for exchange of valuables , the valuable being in this occurrence sexual gratification in exchange for Anne s employmentTangible employment save bedevilment has been outlined by the U .S Supreme judicatory in 2003 . According to The Court , tangible employment action harassment constitutes a significant change in employment pe rspective . such as hiring , firing , failing to abet , reassignment with significantly different responsibilities , or a decision causation a significant change in benefits (Starr and Strauss , 2003 . In the case presented , of these actions occurredHas there been a hostile work milieuAfter first tuition of this case , the initial answer would be yes there hardly must be a hostile work environment . Upon surrounding(prenominal) examination , however , this question becomes quite interesting . A hostile work environment , at its very primary(a) level , includes reiterate unloved conduct , sexual or oppositewise . In this case , the term outcast becomes extremely grave . Assuming for a moment that the on the wholeeged allegations then took send out , a hostile work environment cannot be effected because the complainant did not express that any doings was unwanted , leaving period for it to become a repeated unwanted offenseThe complainant keep offed th e situation until it progressed into greater! offensive behaviorsWas Leisure Hills probe adequateThe investigating was quick , but not seamless in its timing .

Swift to interview twain the complainant and alleged(a) harasser , the company waiting a sidereal day duration to interview potential knockoutes , thus leaving time for birr or both of the parties to taint the memories of the go throughes Furthermore , the time leave between the interviews could have also served to further colorise the memories of the witness because of the clear dislike between parties . In access to the witness problem there were only two , in-house , investigators , bot h of whom could be swayed by past events and personal feelingsIn to conduct this probe at its unspoiltest capacity , there should have been at least(prenominal) whizz outside , impartial investigator . In access , all interviews should have been conducted on the same day without lots time lapsing between interviewsWhat , if any , disciplinary or other remedial actions should Leisure Hills issueThe minimum actions The Leisure Hills Center should take are as followsTheresa Harding should receive a write ensample concerning her disregard for company policy . Harding fully admitted she suggested to the complainant to unless avoid Parson . Harding never suggested to the complainant that she should a charge with vigilance , which is company policyParsons should be removed from his post and reassigned or change Parsons showed little compassion for the complainant . If his behavior was truly indigent , he would not...If you want to get a full essay, high society it on our website: Orde! rCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper